|Submited on :||Sun, 14th of Apr 2019 - 02:31:55 AM|
|Post ID :||bcyavu|
|Post Name :||t3_bcyavu|
|Post Type :||link|
|Subreddit Type :||public|
|Subreddit ID :||t5_311h1|
"Right-wingers support treason because they're all fucking traitors. I hope every last one of you rancid scumbags die today, screaming. Fuck you all to hell."
Why only muslims always "have" a big "problem" i.e. TERRORATTACKS in western societies. Quite different to other religions in the west like Shintos, Hindus, Buddists, Jews, Taoists, Sikhs, Bahai etc. Seems like everyone can get along only Muslims cause problems. Maybe Islam is the problem?
Upvoted cause this is a killthosewhodisagree material.
However, that woman’s problem is significantly worsened by the political decision, so her anger is highly understandable.
She got almost 600 upvotes and a silver for that comment.
What a world we live in.
if someones does something that puts your life at risk, you might think differently about this
Honestly though, I think no matter what politicians decide to do, civility and rationality is something that everyone should adopt. Because if you just want to post something right now screaming and making assumptions and accusations about that politician, people are less likely to listen.
I don't think that anyone here is misrepresenting her post, it's just that she could've said that a lot better and calmly than that.
In other words, as long as you can block out ppl who are being 'uncivil or irrational', then politics will be fine? Who defines 'civil'? Would you be 'civil' if something affected your life in such a profound way?
'No matter what politicians decide to do' is pretty large bubble, don't you think? So bombing the shit out of other countries is ok, as long as the politician explains it nicely? Imprisoning huge percentage of the population is ok? Letting people die of easily curable diseases is ok?
'Civility' is code word for, 'keep quiet so I don't have to listen'. If ppl are being 'uncivil', it's often because there's a problem being ignored that would continue to be ignored if they engaged in 'civility'. People listen only when it becomes impossible to ignore someone.
in general i agree with you. but there are some exceptions to that rule. when a politician makes a decision that puts lifes in danger without having any benefit whatsoever, we should act quickly rather than having a long discussion. we shouldn't sit down and talk for years while people die just because of someone's religious beliefs. think about brunei literally murdering people for being homosexual. do you think we should be civil and tell him that we don't like his decision? if you do, that's okay. but i don't
Well, she mentioned having a chronic disease, so that automatically excuses murder fantasies because this is the internet.
Well that's a pretty blatant misrepresentation of her comment. She has a chronic disease that is made substantially more dangerous by the pointless, ignorance-based legislation in question. She's just wishing on him some of what he's rather carelessly dumped on her.
So what you're saying is that, because she has a chronic disease, her murder fantasies are excused. And yet when I say that its misrepresentation. Gah, why do I even bother anymore?
Well cancer doesn’t automatically kill you.
Wow, never heard of a Republican being called a virtue signaler before. That’s a new one.
The comments on this post justifying her are good r/killthosewhodisagree material. I missed this sub and the crazy fucking neolibs who inhabit it.
Shit like this honestly makes me suicidal.
This is why I am a libertarian, instead of relying on government and over taxation to solve our problems we can just donate to these causes instead.
This is righteous anger and does not belong on this subreddit.
This is gonna be a controversial question, but why doesn't she just not do sex? I know that you should be able to do what you want according to progressives but tbh you're always going to risk having a pregnancy no matter how much you shield yourself with. And if that lady can't have her medication while pregnant then maybe she shouldn't risk it at all?
The ultimate big brain position, if abortion is illegal just don't have sex ever, lmao.
Why can't abortion just stay legal? That seems much simpler and easier.